·    Samples were collected at one metre intervals in calico bags from a cyclone and cone splitter attached to a Reverse Circulation (RC) drill rig. The remainder of the sample (reject) was collected in green mining bags.

·    Samples assessed as prospective for nickel mineralisation were taken in pre-numbered calico bags as single-metre consecutive interval. A typical composite sample weighs between 2 and 3kg.

·    A Bruker S1 Titan portable XRF was used to determine prospective intervals.

·    Certified Reference Materials (CRM) and blank material were alternatively inserted approximately every 25 samples.

·    Samples were analysed by ALS Global in Perth using a 4-acid digest with MEICP-61 finish for 34 elements.

·    Two Reverse Circulation (RC) drill holes, the second with a NQ diamond core tail added, were completed on tenements E47/3719 using a face sampling percussion hammer with 140mm bits. Equipment used was a Austex ED250 drill rig fitted with a Sullair Compressor on board booster and auxiliary unit fitted with an Atlas Copco Y1260 compressor.

·    Holes were drilled at dip angles of -68° and -75° and (magnetic) azimuth angles of 199° and 192° in order to orthogonally intercept the modelled EM plates

·    The geologist visually assessed and recorded drill sample recoveries during the program, and these were overall very good.

·    RC holes were collared with a well-fitting stuff box to ensure material loss to the outside return was minimised. Drilling was undertaken using an auxiliary compressor and booster to keep the hole dry and lift the sample to the sampling equipment. Drill cyclone and splitter were cleaned as required and after each hole to minimise down hole or cross-hole contamination.

·    There were issues with air circulation which resulted in intervals of the holes being drilled and returning wet samples.

·    No relationship between sample recovery and grade has been undertaken.

·    All drill holes have been geologically logged for lithology, weathering, alteration, mineralisation and other features of the samples using sieved rock chips from the reject material.

·    Data was entered in an appropriate database and is of detail suitable for incorporation (if required) into a mineral resource estimation.

·    All drill holes were logged in full.

·    The sample preparation technique carried out in the field is considered industry best standard practice and was completed by the geological consultant.

·    RC samples are collected via a cone splitter. Geological logging of RC chips is completed at site with representative chips being stored in drill chip trays.

·    Consecutive single metre sample splits were collected and placed into a pre-numbered calico bag.

·    The samples were then sent to ALS Global for sample preparation and analysis. Where they will be sorted, dried and pulverised (up to 3kg) to achieve 85% passing 75μm to produce a homogenous representative for analysis.

·    Individual samples were assayed for a suite of 34 elements including nickel related analytes as per the laboratory's procedure for a 4-acid digestion followed by Inductively Coupled Atomic Emission Spectral analysis.

·    The sample sizes are considered to be appropriate to correctly represent base metal sulphide mineralisation and associated geology based on the style of mineralisation (massive and disseminated sulphides), the thickness and consistency of the intersections and the sampling methodology.

·    The NQ core from the second drill hole was not split, sampled or assayed as field analysis using a Pxrf revealed no mineralisation that warranted the laboratory analysis of core samples.

·    Assaying was completed by a commercial registered laboratory with standards and duplicates reported in the sample batch. In addition, nickel Certified Reference Materials (CRM) were inserted into the batch by the geological consultant at a rate of 1:50 samples.

·    No geophysical tools were used to determine any reported element concentration.

·    Select intervals were measured/estimated on a metre basis using a Bruker S1 Titan portable XRF with a reading time of 60 seconds per sample.

·    Assay, sample ID and logging data are matched and validated using filters in the drill database.

·    Assay results are provided by the laboratory to GreenTech in a csv file format and then validated and entered into the database managed by an external contractor.

·    Primary geological and sampling data were recorded on hard copy and digitally and were subsequently transferred to a digital database where it was validated by experienced database personnel assisted by the geological consultant.

·    There has been no validation and cross checking of laboratory performance at this stage.

·    Twinned holes have not been used in this program.

·    Drill hole collars were initially located and pegged using a handheld GPS with an expected accuracy of +/-3m for easting, northing and elevation.

·    The rig was aligned using compass and gyro

·    All drill holes were surveyed using a north seeking gyro and downhole records taken every 5m at the completion of each hole by the drill contractor.

·    The grid system used is GDA94, MGA zone 50.

·    Drill holes were completed at a select geophysical target on tenement E47/3719

·    The spacing and distribution of holes is not relevant to this drilling program which is at the exploration stage rather than definition drilling.

·    The drilling to date at the Project is not sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity to support the definition of Mineral Resource and Reserves and the classifications applied under the 2012 JORC code.

·    The RC portions of the drill holes were sampled at 1 metre intervals down hole.

·    The drill holes were planned to intersect the modelled geophysical target zones at a near perpendicular orientation. However, the orientation of key structures may be locally variable and any relationship to mineralisation has yet to be identified.

·    No orientation-based sampling bias has been identified in the data to date.

·    All samples collected during the program were transported by Newexco the geological consultant to an independent third-party commercial transport contractor who delivered the samples to ALS Global laboratory in Perth for submission and analysis.

·    Sample security was not considered a significant risk to the project, however only employees of Newexco were involved in the sampling and sample custody in a remote area. No specific measures were taken o ensure sample security beyond the normal chain of custody for sample submission.