§ Thirty four (34) rock chip samples were collected from prospective outcropping lithologies in the field using a steel geological hammer.

§ Samples were collected by experienced geologists and samples collected were based on geological observations and availability of material.

§ Samples are not representative of the deposits. Further exploration is required.

§ Sample weights ranged between 0.09kg and 0.49kg. 

§ The sample size is considered representative of the material sampled.

§ Samples were placed in individually numbered calico bags.

§ Samples were submitted to the independent, international accredited Australian Laboratory Services (ALS) Brisbane facility for assay.

§ The sampling technique used is deemed appropriate for the style of mineralization and exploration undertaken.

§ Drilling results are not included in this announcement.

§ Drilling results are not included in this announcement.

§ A description of the sample site, including GPS co-ordinates (GDA94/z54), the rock-type sampled, and the date and time samples were collected were recorded at time of sampling.

§ Logging is qualitative in data.

§ Sample sites and rock specimens were photographed.

§ Samples were prepared and analysed at ALS Brisbane's facilities.

§ ALS have internal QA/QC procedures to ensure a representative sample is assayed.

§ Samples were crushed so that each sample has a nominal 85% passing <75um.

§ Based on information provided, sample sizes and the sampling preparation technique is considered appropriate for rock chip sampling and to correctly represent interpreted mineralisation given the status of the projects and allow an assessment of exploration potential.

§ Industry standard QAQC was utilised included standards and blanks.

§ The assay techniques employed included mixed acid digestion with ICP-OES, ICP-AES, ICP-MS and AAS finishes. These methods are considered appropriate for the targeted mineralisation and regarded as a 'near total' digestion technique with resistive phases not expected to affect copper analysis using the ME-MS61R method.

§ ALS provided their own routine quality controls within their own practices as per international ISO Standards, including the insertion of standard and blanks. The company has not included QAQC given the type of sampling.

§ No QAQC issues were noted.

§ No geophysical surveys were undertaken at this time.

§ No independent sampling was commissioned by CCZ.

§ An experienced geologist reviewed the digital assay data. 

§ No adjustments have been made to the digital assay data.

§ CCZ finds no reason to question the veracity of the digital assay data provided and reported in this announcement.

§ ALS provided their own routine quality controls within their own practices as per international ISO Standards.

§ No QAQC issues were noted.

§ The co-ordinates of the sample sites were recorded using a handheld Garmin GPS.

§ The grid-system used is GDA94 UTM Zone 54. 

§ Topographic control is considered adequate.

§ Location accuracy is +/-10m.

§ The approach is considered acceptable for the nature of the sampling program.

§ Sampling was of a reconnaissance nature.

§ The spacing and location of the sample sites, by the nature of early exploration are variable.

§ The spacing and location of data is currently only being considered for exploration purposes and is not sufficient to determine geological and grade continuity.

§ Due to the early stage of exploration, the spacing and location of sample sites is not material to the type of reporting

§ No sampling compositing was used.

§ The twenty one (21) rock chip samples collected at Boomerang were taken from exposed sections of the Surprise Creek Formation.

§ The thirteen (13) rock chip samp les collected at Josephine were taken from exposed sections of the Gunpowder Creek Formation, Paradise Formation and Surprise Creek Formation.

§ By its nature, the rock chip data is insufficient to confirm optimal drilling orientation of a possible future drilling campaign.

§ CCZ staff and contractors ensured a strict chain of custody procedures that were adhered to for all thirty four (34) rock chip samples.

§ All sample bags were pre-numbered and securely closed, ensuring no material could spill out during transport.

§ No formal audit has been conducted on the data being reported.

§ The North-West Queensland (NWQ) Copper Project consists of five (5) tenures.

§ Boomerang and Josephine Prospect Areas are located within the same tenure (EPM26462) and on Chidna Station.

§ No joint ventures of royalties are understood to impact the tenements.

§ No known impediments are understood to occur to allow for further exploration.

§ Several generations of drilling and exploration have been conducted at Boomerang and Josephine Prospect Areas, including geological mapping, geochemical surveys and the drilling of nine (9) rotary air blast (RAB) holes, drilled at Boomerang during the early 1970s.

§ Exploration is considered to be at an early stage across EPM26462.

§ The NWQ Copper Project is located within the Mt Isa Inlier of western Queensland, a large, exposed section of Proterozoic (2.5 billion- to 540-million-year-old) crustal rocks.  The inlier records a long history of tectonic evolution, now thought to be like that of the Broken Hill Block in western New South Wales.

§ The NWQ Copper Project lies within the Mt Oxide Domain, straddling the Lawn Hill Platform and Leichhardt River Fault Trough. The geology of the tenement is principally comprised of rocks of the Surprise Creek and Quilalar Formations which include feldspathic quartzites, conglomerates, arkosic grits, shales, siltstones and minor dolomites and limestones.

§ The NWQ Copper Project area is cut by a major fault zone, trending north-north east to south-southwest across the permits. This fault is associated with major folding, forming several tight syncline and anticline structures along its length.

§ Almost without exception known copper mineralisation around Boomerang and Josephine Prospect Areas is hosted within the upper rock units of the Paradise Creek and Surprise Creek Formation.

§ Major copper orebodies in the area such as Mt. Oxide and Mt Gordon/Capricorn Copper are manifested as a breccia and replacement zones associated with interconnecting faults, especially associated with the Mt Gordon Fault Zone (MGFZ). 

§ The MGFZ bisects the Boomerang and Josephine targets.

§ Mineralisation associated with MGFZ is primarily chalcopyrite-pyrite-chalcocite, typically as massive sulphide within breccias.

§ Drilling results are not included in this announcement.

§ No weighted averaging techniques of minimum/maximum grade truncations (cut off/top cut) have been applied.

§ This announcement is for surface samples only.

§ Surface samples do not inform the geometry of mineralisation.

§ Suitable figures have been included in the body of this announcement.

§ Key results have been included in the body of this announcement.

§ Historical exploration data mentioned in this announcement can be found in previous announcements.

§ CCZ notes that historical exploration data is available in the public domain via the GSQ Open Data Portal.

§ As part of the Company's strategic review, assay results will be used in conjunction with historic exploration data to define priority exploration targets within the NWQ Copper Project.

§ Follow up field work is planned, potentially including a more extensive rock chip sampling program.