- Price
- 223.00p
- Market cap
- £858m
- 1M
- +5.6%
- 3M
- +18.8%
- 1Y
- +0.1%
- P/E (trailing)
- 14.8
- Dividend yield
- 5.06%
“FY26 expectations and current trading: · Underlying3 EBITDA is tracking in line with current market expectations”
underlying EBITDA
“Total system sales were 382.7m, up 2.1% vs. Q3 24 and, on a like-for-like basis (excluding splits), grew by 1.0%. Trading throughout the period has continued in line with our expectations, reflecting the impact of the weaker QSR market on our franchisees and customers' lower discretionary income.”
system sales
“Continue to expect FY25 Underlying EBITDA in line with market expectations”
underlying EBITDA
“We expect FY25 Underlying EBITDA to be in line with current market expectations,6 excluding the positive impact of the Victa investment announced today.”
underlying EBITDA
Last 24 months of trading updates, one verdict per announcement (the headline profit measure first). Companies report these themselves and lean positive, so compare against peers: the same tag-based peer group as the Overview, counting peers with at least 2 updates and needing at least 3. Verdicts are machine-extracted; where the quoted wording clearly says otherwise, the wording is used.
“FY26 expectations and current trading: · Underlying3 EBITDA is tracking in line with current market expectations”
underlying EBITDA
“Total system sales were 382.7m, up 2.1% vs. Q3 24 and, on a like-for-like basis (excluding splits), grew by 1.0%. Trading throughout the period has continued in line with our expectations, reflecting the impact of the weaker QSR market on our franchisees and customers' lower discretionary income.”
system sales
“Continue to expect FY25 Underlying EBITDA in line with market expectations”
underlying EBITDA
“We expect FY25 Underlying EBITDA to be in line with current market expectations,6 excluding the positive impact of the Victa investment announced today.”
underlying EBITDA
Last 24 months of trading updates, one verdict per announcement (the headline profit measure first). Companies report these themselves and lean positive, so compare against peers: the same tag-based peer group as the Overview, counting peers with at least 2 updates and needing at least 3. Verdicts are machine-extracted; where the quoted wording clearly says otherwise, the wording is used.