·    Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels, random chips, or specific specialized industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc.). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling.

·    Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used.

·    Aspects of the determination of mineralization that are Material to the Public Report.

·    In cases where 'industry standard' work has been done this would be relatively simple (e.g. 'reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverized to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay'). In other cases, more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralization types (e.g. submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information.

·    RC cuttings from a drill hole are collected in a RC cyclone after travelling through the hosepipe. Contamination in the cyclone is barred by passing compressed air after every 6m in unmineralized sections and every meter in mineralized sections.

·    Sample representivity is ensured by carefully passing speared chip samples on the 2:1 riffle splitter in a horizontal fashion from one end of the splitter to the other end. The splitter is cleaned using compressed air after every sampled meter.

·    Before any drilling program, all equipment is inspected and calibration/inspection certificates checked for compliance.

·    Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc.) and details (e.g. core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc.).

·    RC drilling technique was used using a UDR650 rig. Hole diameter was the standard 5 ½".

·    Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed.

·    Measures taken to maximize sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples.

·    Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.

·    Chip sample volume for every meter interval is monitored. Recovery is taken to be a factor of the average weight of the bulk sample in a drill hole. This way, a percentage is derived by dividing a particular interval's bulk sample with the average bulk sample weight and multiplying by 100.

·    Recovery is classified as follows: Poor (<50%), Average (50-70%) and Good (>70%).

·    All drill holes generally had good recovery.

·    Sample recovery is maximized by using an auxiliary booster and compressor once the water table is encountered.

·    Representative nature of the samples is ensured by using both a PVC spear rod and riffle splitter during the sampling procedure. The PVC rod is speared in five different directions to extract chips in the bulk/reject sample bag.

·    No sample bias occurred.

·    Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies.

·    Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc.) photography.

·    The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged.

·    Chip logging is both qualitative and quantitative.

·    Chip samples are logged geologically. Parameters recorded include lithology, alteration, deformation, structural features (e.g., veining), mineralization, colour and textural characteristics.

·    Total length of all drilling data is 1,231 m  

·    If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken.

·    If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc. and whether sampled wet or dry.

·    For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique.

·    Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximize representivity of samples.

·    Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling.

·    Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled.

·    RC Sampling:

·      For every meter drilled, a bulk/reject sample bag of ~40 kg is used to pack the chip samples. This bag is weighed and placed on the sampling station. It is shaken to mix contents and laid flat on the ground. A 50mm PVC spear is then used to scoop the dry chips in five different directions, diagonally and horizontally. Each scoop is carefully spread over a 2:1 riffle splitter for even distribution of chips into two plates under the splitter. Chip contents of one plate, weighing 2.5-3kg are packed in a small sample bag, which has been labelled and ticketed for dispatch to the lab. Chip contents of the other identical plate are packed in another small bag for storage in the yard (for future reference).

·      Contamination in the cyclone is barred by passing compressed air after every 6m in unmineralized sections and every meter in mineralized sections.

·      One of three CRMs are inserted in every 10 small dispatch samples for QAQC control in the lab during analysis. AMIS certificate reference materials used for QAQC control are as follows: AMIS0681 (Blank), AMIS0571 (Low-grade Au) and AMIS0724 (High-grade Au). Field-prepared duplicate samples are part of QC. Duplicate performance was good.

·      Sample representivity is ensured by carefully passing speared chip samples on the 2:1 riffle splitter in a horizontal fashion from one end of the splitter to the other end. The splitter is cleaned using compressed air after every sampled meter.

·    The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total.

·    For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc., the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc.

·    Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g. standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and precision have been established.

·    SGS Mineral Services Laboratory in Mwanza (Tanzania) analysed the RC samples.

·    SGS has an ISO/IEC 17025:2005 certification and SANAS accreditation.

·    In the lab, each sample is pulverized and weighed. A 50g aliquot is thereafter subjected to fire assay analysis with an AAS finish.

·    For QAQC, CRMs (in the field) were inserted for every 10 small, lab-dispatch samples.

·    The lab does repeat analyses on some of the samples.

·    Duplicate and CRM performance on the analysed samples was good.

·    This assay methodology is appropriate for the resource in question.

·    No geophysical tools were used.

·    The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel.

·    The use of twinned holes.

·    Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols.

·    Discuss any adjustment to assay data.

·    The internal technical team verified significant intersections.

·    No twinned holes were used.

·    Data entry is done under the guidance of RRRK's Standard Operating Procedures and verified by Project Geologists.

·    No adjustments were made to assay data.

·    Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation.

·    Specification of the grid system used.

·    Quality and adequacy of topographic control.

·    Drill holes were marked using a handheld Etrex 32x GPS with a 1-meter accuracy.

·    Coordinates were recorded in the UTM Arc1960 Zone 36S coordinate format.

·    Drill hole collars will be surveyed using a DGPS.

·    The RC holes were surveyed downhole using a Reflex camera- Single Shot technique, every 30m.

·    Full adequacy of topographic control will be achieved after DGPS surveying.

·    Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.

·    Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied.

·    Whether sample compositing has been applied.

·    Data spacing and distribution in infill drilling areas is sufficient to establish degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource estimation procedures.

·    Targets undergoing anomaly testing however require further work to ensure compliance with JORC 2012 guidelines.

·    Sample compositing has not been applied.

·    Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type.

·    If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralized structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material.

·    Drill holes are designed to intersect subsurface structures and mineralization perpendicularly, at an azimuth angle of 25º and dip of -60º.

·    Azimuth and dip angles were determined from the general trend and dip orientations of host rocks.

·    It is not considered that drilling orientation has introduced a sampling bias.

·    The measures taken to ensure sample security.

·    Drilling samples are stored in a secured core yard within the exploration camp facility.

·    A chain of custody is applied while transporting lab samples to the SGS analytical facility in Mwanza.

·    This includes sealing all polyweave bags containing the shipment with unique tags, ticketing individual sample bags, using packing lists to organize dispatch of samples, and tracking sample movement between the point of exit and point of entry.

·    The lab gives a confirmation message once samples are received.

·    The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data.

·    No external audit of the results, beyond the laboratory internal QAQC measures, has taken place.

·    Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings.

·    The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a license to operate in the area.

·    Mid Migori Mining Limited holds two Prospecting Licenses (PL). These are PL/2018/0202 and PL/2018/0203. The Government of Kenya through the Department of Mines and Geology granted them. The licenses have a 3-year tenure and the Company shall apply for renewal in 2023.

·    The licenses cover Migori, Nyatike, Kuria and Transmara areas in the southwestern part of Kenya, over a combined area of 245 km².

·    RedRock has the full rights to conduct exploration activities in its license areas, which jointly constitute the Migori Gold Project.

·    The tenure is currently in good standing.

·    There are no known issues regarding security of tenure.

·    Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties.

·    The license area has an exploration history of more than 50 years.

·    Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralization.

·    The Migori Greenstone belt (MGB) forms part of the Nyanzian Supergroup, itself part of the northern extension of the gold-enriched Archaean Tanzanian craton. The granite-greenstone terrain to the south of the MGB is host to world class producing gold mines (e.g. North Mara: 4Moz Au and Geita: 7Moz Au). The Tanzanian craton is of a similar age to other significant orogenic gold belts such as the Yilgarn in Australia and the Lake Superior province in Canada.  The mineralization and stratigraphy of the MGB is similar to that of the Lake Victoria Greenstone belts in Tanzania and other Archaean greenstone deposits such as Red Lake in Canada (3.2Moz Au). Gold enrichment within the MGB is predominantly found in and around shear zones associated with quartz-carbonate veining and significant alteration, as well as banded iron formations (BIFs) and polymetallic Volcanogenic Massive Sulphides (VMS). The dominant lithologies are felsic and mafic intrusive, BIFs and metasediments of the Nyanzian system, overlain by younger Kavirondian volcaniclastic sediments and intruded by younger granitic intrusions.

·    A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes:

o  easting and northing of the drill hole collar

o  elevation or RL (Reduced Level - elevation above sea level in meters) of the drill hole collar

o  dip and azimuth of the hole

o  down hole length and interception depth

o  hole length.

·    If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case.

·    A table containing collar information and interception data is included in the body of the announcement.

·    In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated.

·    Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail.

·    The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated.

·    All results presented are length weighted.

·    A cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t was used in reporting Exploration results.

·    These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results.

·    If the geometry of the mineralization with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported.

·    If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (e.g. 'down hole length, true width not known').

·    The relationship between mineralization widths and intercept lengths is not known at this time.

·    Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported. These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views.

·    Appropriate diagrams have been provided in the body of the announcement.

·    Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results.

·    The reporting is balanced.

·    Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples - size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances.

·    There is no other substantive exploration data associated with this release.

·    The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g. tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling).

·    Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive.

·    Phase 2 drilling will follow up on significant intercepts from Phase 1 drill holes at depth, in addition to testing mineralization zones laterally along strike. Most holes will be drilled using the RC technique while a few will be DD holes but pre-collared with RC.