·           Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). 

·           Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed. 

·           Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. 

·           Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material. 

·           Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. 

·           Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography. 

·           The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. 

·           If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. 

·           If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. 

·           For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. 

·           Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples. 

·           Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling. 

·           Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled. 

·           The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. 

·           For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. 

·           Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established. 

·    The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel. 

·    The use of twinned holes. 

·    Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. 

·    Discuss any adjustment to assay data. 

·    Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. 

·    Specification of the grid system used. 

·    Quality and adequacy of topographic control. 

·    Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. 

·    Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. 

·    Whether sample compositing has been applied. 

·    Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. 

·    If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. 

·       The measures taken to ensure sample security. 

·       The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data.