- Price
- 282.00p
- Market cap
- £623m
- 1M
- +0.5%
- 3M
- +1.3%
- 1Y
- +0.2%
- P/E (trailing)
- —
- Dividend yield
- —
“The Board remains confident of delivering full year 2026 EBITDA in line with current market expectations.”
EBITDA
“The Board is confident of delivering full year 2026 revenue and EBITDA in line with current market expectations7”
adjusted EBITDA
“The Group expects to report full year 2025 revenues of approximately £228.5 million (2024: £177.5 million), EBITDA of £49.5 - £50.0 million (2024: £40.2 million), and the Board is confident of meeting market expectations.”
EBITDA
“The Board remains confident of delivering full year 2025 revenue and EBITDA in line with expectations and believes that AMS is well positioned to drive sustained growth, margin expansion and long-term value creation.”
EBITDA
Last 24 months of trading updates, one verdict per announcement (the headline profit measure first). Companies report these themselves and lean positive, so compare against peers: the same tag-based peer group as the Overview, counting peers with at least 2 updates and needing at least 3. Verdicts are machine-extracted; where the quoted wording clearly says otherwise, the wording is used.
“The Board remains confident of delivering full year 2026 EBITDA in line with current market expectations.”
EBITDA
“The Board is confident of delivering full year 2026 revenue and EBITDA in line with current market expectations7”
adjusted EBITDA
“The Group expects to report full year 2025 revenues of approximately £228.5 million (2024: £177.5 million), EBITDA of £49.5 - £50.0 million (2024: £40.2 million), and the Board is confident of meeting market expectations.”
EBITDA
“The Board remains confident of delivering full year 2025 revenue and EBITDA in line with expectations and believes that AMS is well positioned to drive sustained growth, margin expansion and long-term value creation.”
EBITDA
Last 24 months of trading updates, one verdict per announcement (the headline profit measure first). Companies report these themselves and lean positive, so compare against peers: the same tag-based peer group as the Overview, counting peers with at least 2 updates and needing at least 3. Verdicts are machine-extracted; where the quoted wording clearly says otherwise, the wording is used.