- Price
- 43.86p
- Market cap
- £584m
- 1M
- +5.9%
- 3M
- +6.4%
- 1Y
- +5.8%
- P/E (trailing)
- —
- Dividend yield
- —
“Revenue and adjusted EBITDA for the full year are expected to be within the range of analyst forecasts for FY 2025, with weighting towards H2 consistent with the destocking seen in Q1 and typical industry seasonality. These forecasts assume the inclusion of IQE Taiwan revenues pending the outcome of the Strategic Review. 1. The analyst range of expectations for FY 2025 revenue are from £115.1m to £123.0m and for adjusted EBITDA from £7.4m to £10.0m.”
adjusted EBITDA · stated consensus £7.4m–£10.0m
“I am pleased that the business performance in 2024 will show revenue and adjusted EBITDA ahead of expectations.”
adjusted EBITDA
Last 24 months of trading updates, one verdict per announcement (the headline profit measure first). Companies report these themselves and lean positive, so compare against peers: the same tag-based peer group as the Overview, counting peers with at least 2 updates and needing at least 3. Verdicts are machine-extracted; where the quoted wording clearly says otherwise, the wording is used.
“Revenue and adjusted EBITDA for the full year are expected to be within the range of analyst forecasts for FY 2025, with weighting towards H2 consistent with the destocking seen in Q1 and typical industry seasonality. These forecasts assume the inclusion of IQE Taiwan revenues pending the outcome of the Strategic Review. 1. The analyst range of expectations for FY 2025 revenue are from £115.1m to £123.0m and for adjusted EBITDA from £7.4m to £10.0m.”
adjusted EBITDA · stated consensus £7.4m–£10.0m
“I am pleased that the business performance in 2024 will show revenue and adjusted EBITDA ahead of expectations.”
adjusted EBITDA
Last 24 months of trading updates, one verdict per announcement (the headline profit measure first). Companies report these themselves and lean positive, so compare against peers: the same tag-based peer group as the Overview, counting peers with at least 2 updates and needing at least 3. Verdicts are machine-extracted; where the quoted wording clearly says otherwise, the wording is used.