- Price
- 131.23p
- Market cap
- £377m
- 1M
- -2.2%
- 3M
- -6.1%
- 1Y
- -0.1%
- P/E (trailing)
- —
- Dividend yield
- —
“Adjusted EBITDA** up 12% to approximately £46m (FY25: £41.1m), ahead of market expectations”
adjusted EBITDA · stated consensus £249.5m
“Trading in line with market expectations for FY263 · Adjusted EBITDA¹ up 10.7% to £21.8m (H1 25: £19.7m)”
adjusted EBITDA · stated consensus £249.5m
“The Group remains on track to deliver full-year performance in line with market expectations1”
revenue
“EBITDA* of approximately 84m (stated prior to Partner Remuneration under the historical LLP structure), up 36.4% on the prior year (FY24: 61.6m) ... ahead of market expectations*** (see note 1).”
statutory EBITDA · stated consensus £216.0m
Model estimate: 43% ahead · 38% in line · 19% below. A statistical estimate, not a forecast.
Last 24 months of trading updates, one verdict per announcement (the headline profit measure first). Companies report these themselves and lean positive, so compare against peers: the same tag-based peer group as the Overview, counting peers with at least 2 updates and needing at least 3. Verdicts are machine-extracted; where the quoted wording clearly says otherwise, the wording is used.
“Adjusted EBITDA** up 12% to approximately £46m (FY25: £41.1m), ahead of market expectations”
adjusted EBITDA · stated consensus £249.5m
“Trading in line with market expectations for FY263 · Adjusted EBITDA¹ up 10.7% to £21.8m (H1 25: £19.7m)”
adjusted EBITDA · stated consensus £249.5m
“The Group remains on track to deliver full-year performance in line with market expectations1”
revenue
“EBITDA* of approximately 84m (stated prior to Partner Remuneration under the historical LLP structure), up 36.4% on the prior year (FY24: 61.6m) ... ahead of market expectations*** (see note 1).”
statutory EBITDA · stated consensus £216.0m
Model estimate: 43% ahead · 38% in line · 19% below. A statistical estimate, not a forecast.
Last 24 months of trading updates, one verdict per announcement (the headline profit measure first). Companies report these themselves and lean positive, so compare against peers: the same tag-based peer group as the Overview, counting peers with at least 2 updates and needing at least 3. Verdicts are machine-extracted; where the quoted wording clearly says otherwise, the wording is used.