- Price
- 2.63p
- Market cap
- £5m
- 1M
- +11.0%
- 3M
- -6.1%
- 1Y
- -0.7%
- P/E (trailing)
- —
- Dividend yield
- 0.00%
“Underlying unaudited adjusted EBITDA of £6.1m and cash at year end of £9.3m, both slightly ahead of market expectations”
EBITDA
“Two JDA customers signed up, with potential for further JDAs and product revenues - full year revenue expected to be c. £11.3m, in line with market expectations”
revenue
“Unaudited revenues are £7.6m, exceeding market forecasts[2]”
revenue · stated consensus £7.2m
“As a result of completion of the settlement agreement with the European electronics customer in addition to some other small commercial wins, revenue for the year ended 31 July 2025 is now expected to be ahead of current market expectations2. The revenue forecast for FY25 is £6.6m, as prepared by Cavendish.”
revenue
Last 24 months of trading updates, one verdict per announcement (the headline profit measure first). Companies report these themselves and lean positive, so compare against peers: the same tag-based peer group as the Overview, counting peers with at least 2 updates and needing at least 3. Verdicts are machine-extracted; where the quoted wording clearly says otherwise, the wording is used.
“Underlying unaudited adjusted EBITDA of £6.1m and cash at year end of £9.3m, both slightly ahead of market expectations”
EBITDA
“Two JDA customers signed up, with potential for further JDAs and product revenues - full year revenue expected to be c. £11.3m, in line with market expectations”
revenue
“Unaudited revenues are £7.6m, exceeding market forecasts[2]”
revenue · stated consensus £7.2m
“As a result of completion of the settlement agreement with the European electronics customer in addition to some other small commercial wins, revenue for the year ended 31 July 2025 is now expected to be ahead of current market expectations2. The revenue forecast for FY25 is £6.6m, as prepared by Cavendish.”
revenue
Last 24 months of trading updates, one verdict per announcement (the headline profit measure first). Companies report these themselves and lean positive, so compare against peers: the same tag-based peer group as the Overview, counting peers with at least 2 updates and needing at least 3. Verdicts are machine-extracted; where the quoted wording clearly says otherwise, the wording is used.